I was recently studying the topic of belief when I came across a story that I’m
compelled to share. It’s about a man who
doesn’t believe and went to great lengths to confirm his doubts.
In April of 2006,
National Geographic published an article entitled—and I’m not kidding—Jesus May have Walked on Ice, Not Water
Scientists Say! This is a direct
quote from the article…
"A rare set of weather events may have combined to
create a slab of ice about 4 to 6 inches [10 to 15 centimeters] thick on the
lake, [making it] able to support a person's weight," said Doron Nof, an
oceanographer at Florida State University in Tallahassee."
"Our models show that there was a cold snap at that time, which lasted a few days and drastically lowered the temperature."
This article leads me to two assumptions:
- Dr. Nof has waaay too much time on his hands
- The cold-snap created the ice necessary for Jesus to walk across the lake
Honestly I
understand that Jesus could possibly have walked on ice. But what about the disciples and the
boat?
I did some research
of my own through the help of Google.
Apparently there was a photographer there who captured the moment on
film.
So…I guess it’s
possible that it got cold and Jesus walked on ice. But this brings up several questions:
·
How
were the disciples rowing in the storm?
·
Where
did the waves come from?
·
Maybe
most importantly…how did Peter sink?
When God graces us
with eyes to see the truth, we choose to believe it all. We don’t have to be able to explain it all,
and we certainly don’t have to be able to prove it all. But what happens as we walk with God is that our faith in His truth is
strengthened no matter how diligently the unbelieving scientific community works to
discount and discredit our convictions.
So what about this
supposed battle between faith and science?
Are the two really incompatible? For
those who are willing to look at the facts—the real facts—good science always supports
God’s truth.
Dr. Soren Lovtrup,
Professor of Zoo-physiology at the University of Umea in Sweden, made this
observation about what he called “blind chance” biology, in his book Darwinism:
Refutation of a Myth.
“I suppose that nobody will deny that it is
a great misfortune if an entire branch of science becomes addicted to a false
theory, but this is what happened in biology…. I believe that one day the
Darwinian myth will be ranked the greatest deceit in the history of
science. When this happens, many people
will pose the question, ‘How did this ever happen?’”
Here's a man who looked at the facts and let them speak for themselves. Now that's good science and it supports the truth that will set us free!
No comments:
Post a Comment